Charitable trust registration requires a specified-violation notice; settled cash deposits and related-party payments did not justify cancellation or ...
External development charges trigger TDS under section 194C, while disputed administrative payments require factual verification and fresh adjudicatio...
Section 270AA penalty immunity requires identified statutory defaults and a hearing before rejection; reassessment disclosure may constitute under-rep...
Section 80JJAA employee-cost deduction allowed for deployed staff but barred against transfer-pricing income enhancement, with pricing issues remanded...
Transfer-pricing methodology protects commercially genuine associated-enterprise payments, while pre-2016 secondary adjustments and related notional i...
Negative liens over operating assets can constitute international transactions requiring arm's-length pricing reflecting restricted borrowing and expa...
Cross-examination rights in Customs Broker revocation inquiries require witness examination; procedural denial may be cured through fresh adjudication...
ITAT held that the reassessment proceedings were void ab initio due to complete absence of a mandatory notice under s. 143(2) of the Act. The assessee had filed a belated return seven days before completion of reassessment, and the AO expressly relied on this return by starting the computation from the returned income and thereafter making additions for unexplained gifts. Once the AO took cognizance of the return, issuance of notice under s. 143(2) became mandatory. ITAT further held that s. 292BB cannot cure the total absence of such notice, as it only validates defects in service. Consequently, the reassessment and resultant additions were quashed and the assessee's appeal allowed.
ITAT held that the reassessment proceedings were void ab initio due to complete absence of a mandatory notice under s. 143(2) of the Act. The assessee had filed a belated return seven days before completion of reassessment, and the AO expressly relied on this return by starting the computation from the returned income and thereafter making additions for unexplained gifts. Once the AO took cognizance of the return, issuance of notice under s. 143(2) became mandatory. ITAT further held that s. 292BB cannot cure the total absence of such notice, as it only validates defects in service. Consequently, the reassessment and resultant additions were quashed and the assessee's appeal allowed.
Note: It is a system-generated summary and is for quick reference only.