Charitable trust registration requires a specified-violation notice; settled cash deposits and related-party payments did not justify cancellation or ...
External development charges trigger TDS under section 194C, while disputed administrative payments require factual verification and fresh adjudicatio...
Section 270AA penalty immunity requires identified statutory defaults and a hearing before rejection; reassessment disclosure may constitute under-rep...
Section 80JJAA employee-cost deduction allowed for deployed staff but barred against transfer-pricing income enhancement, with pricing issues remanded...
Transfer-pricing methodology protects commercially genuine associated-enterprise payments, while pre-2016 secondary adjustments and related notional i...
Negative liens over operating assets can constitute international transactions requiring arm's-length pricing reflecting restricted borrowing and expa...
Cross-examination rights in Customs Broker revocation inquiries require witness examination; procedural denial may be cured through fresh adjudication...
HC held that the appeals challenging interlocutory orders dated 15.11.2017 and 30.10.2017 were not maintainable and affirmed the third member's view on this limited issue. The HC expressly clarified that any observations made on merits in the order dated 26.07.2019 were only for deciding maintainability and shall not prejudice adjudication on merits. HC further held that, if the Adjudicating Authority ultimately passes a final order adverse to the appellants and they file a statutory appeal, they will be at liberty to assail the alleged denial of cross-examination and recall of witnesses in respect of the said interlocutory orders. The Tribunal, in such future appeal, must consider these grounds uninfluenced by earlier observations. Adjudication proceedings are to resume without further delay. Both appeals were disposed of.
HC held that the appeals challenging interlocutory orders dated 15.11.2017 and 30.10.2017 were not maintainable and affirmed the third member's view on this limited issue. The HC expressly clarified that any observations made on merits in the order dated 26.07.2019 were only for deciding maintainability and shall not prejudice adjudication on merits. HC further held that, if the Adjudicating Authority ultimately passes a final order adverse to the appellants and they file a statutory appeal, they will be at liberty to assail the alleged denial of cross-examination and recall of witnesses in respect of the said interlocutory orders. The Tribunal, in such future appeal, must consider these grounds uninfluenced by earlier observations. Adjudication proceedings are to resume without further delay. Both appeals were disposed of.
Note: It is a system-generated summary and is for quick reference only.
TaxTMI 
TaxTMI 
of 4827 
Join Channel 
