Charitable trust registration requires a specified-violation notice; settled cash deposits and related-party payments did not justify cancellation or ...
External development charges trigger TDS under section 194C, while disputed administrative payments require factual verification and fresh adjudicatio...
Section 270AA penalty immunity requires identified statutory defaults and a hearing before rejection; reassessment disclosure may constitute under-rep...
Section 80JJAA employee-cost deduction allowed for deployed staff but barred against transfer-pricing income enhancement, with pricing issues remanded...
Transfer-pricing methodology protects commercially genuine associated-enterprise payments, while pre-2016 secondary adjustments and related notional i...
Negative liens over operating assets can constitute international transactions requiring arm's-length pricing reflecting restricted borrowing and expa...
Cross-examination rights in Customs Broker revocation inquiries require witness examination; procedural denial may be cured through fresh adjudication...
ITAT allowed the assessee's appeal, deleting the addition made by the AO on account of capital introduced in the business. ITAT held that duly executed agreements to sell agricultural land, evidencing full receipt of sale consideration, along with details of sellers, buyers, PAN, and photo identity, constitute a plausible and satisfactory explanation of the source of funds. It was held unjust for the AO to discredit these agreements merely due to non-execution of registered sale deeds, particularly in the context of joint landholdings and co-sharers where specific survey-wise conveyance may not be feasible. In the absence of any independent inquiry or rebuttal by the Revenue, the source of capital could not be doubted, and the addition was unsustainable.
ITAT allowed the assessee's appeal, deleting the addition made by the AO on account of capital introduced in the business. ITAT held that duly executed agreements to sell agricultural land, evidencing full receipt of sale consideration, along with details of sellers, buyers, PAN, and photo identity, constitute a plausible and satisfactory explanation of the source of funds. It was held unjust for the AO to discredit these agreements merely due to non-execution of registered sale deeds, particularly in the context of joint landholdings and co-sharers where specific survey-wise conveyance may not be feasible. In the absence of any independent inquiry or rebuttal by the Revenue, the source of capital could not be doubted, and the addition was unsustainable.
Note: It is a system-generated summary and is for quick reference only.