Introducing the “In Favour Of” filter in Case Laws.
- ⚖️ Instantly identify judgments decided in favour of the Assessee, Revenue, or Appellant
- 🔍 Narrow down results with higher precision
Try it now in Case Laws →
TaxTMI Login
🚀 New Feature Launched ✕
Just a moment...
Introducing the “In Favour Of” filter in Case Laws.
Try it now in Case Laws →
Press 'Enter' to add multiple search terms. Rules for Better Search
of 
of 
No Folders have been created
Are you sure you want to delete "My most important" ?
NOTE:
of of 
All Highlights
of of All Highlights
Note
Bookmark
Share
Don't have an account? Register Here
of ITAT allowed the assessee's appeal, deleting the addition made by the AO on account of capital introduced in the business. ITAT held that duly executed agreements to sell agricultural land, evidencing full receipt of sale consideration, along with details of sellers, buyers, PAN, and photo identity, constitute a plausible and satisfactory explanation of the source of funds. It was held unjust for the AO to discredit these agreements merely due to non-execution of registered sale deeds, particularly in the context of joint landholdings and co-sharers where specific survey-wise conveyance may not be feasible. In the absence of any independent inquiry or rebuttal by the Revenue, the source of capital could not be doubted, and the addition was unsustainable.
TaxTMI 
TaxTMI 
