Charitable trust registration requires a specified-violation notice; settled cash deposits and related-party payments did not justify cancellation or ...
External development charges trigger TDS under section 194C, while disputed administrative payments require factual verification and fresh adjudicatio...
Section 270AA penalty immunity requires identified statutory defaults and a hearing before rejection; reassessment disclosure may constitute under-rep...
Section 80JJAA employee-cost deduction allowed for deployed staff but barred against transfer-pricing income enhancement, with pricing issues remanded...
Transfer-pricing methodology protects commercially genuine associated-enterprise payments, while pre-2016 secondary adjustments and related notional i...
Negative liens over operating assets can constitute international transactions requiring arm's-length pricing reflecting restricted borrowing and expa...
Cross-examination rights in Customs Broker revocation inquiries require witness examination; procedural denial may be cured through fresh adjudication...
ITAT held that employees of the State Power Corporation are not "Government employees" or employees of a qualifying Government undertaking for purposes of s.10(10AA)/10(10A) IT Act. Accordingly, exemption on leave encashment is not available for the period of service rendered under the Corporation. However, ITAT found that the predecessor State Electricity Board constituted an undertaking of the State Government falling within s.10(10AA)/10(10A). Since A1 had rendered qualifying service with the Board from 18.11.1983 to 16.04.2010 and was subsequently compulsorily transferred to the Corporation under a restructuring scheme, denial of exemption for the portion relatable to Board service would defeat the beneficial object of the provision. ITAT therefore upheld relief for leave encashment of Rs.13,02,816 relatable to the Board service, while confirming taxability of the balance relatable to service with the Corporation.
ITAT held that employees of the State Power Corporation are not "Government employees" or employees of a qualifying Government undertaking for purposes of s.10(10AA)/10(10A) IT Act. Accordingly, exemption on leave encashment is not available for the period of service rendered under the Corporation. However, ITAT found that the predecessor State Electricity Board constituted an undertaking of the State Government falling within s.10(10AA)/10(10A). Since A1 had rendered qualifying service with the Board from 18.11.1983 to 16.04.2010 and was subsequently compulsorily transferred to the Corporation under a restructuring scheme, denial of exemption for the portion relatable to Board service would defeat the beneficial object of the provision. ITAT therefore upheld relief for leave encashment of Rs.13,02,816 relatable to the Board service, while confirming taxability of the balance relatable to service with the Corporation.
Note: It is a system-generated summary and is for quick reference only.
TaxTMI 
TaxTMI 
of 4827 
Join Channel 
