Political contribution deductions require genuine transactions; banking records and party registration alone cannot defeat evidence of accommodation e...
Post-death GST liability permits fresh proceedings against legal representatives, while discontinued-business recovery remains limited to the inherite...
Non-confirmation of FEMA seizure prevents adjudicators from overriding pending appellate findings on recorded reasons and suspected foreign asset hold...
CESTAT allowed the appeal filed by M/s X against the impugned service tax demand. It held that "flash butt welding" and works contract services executed in relation to Indian Railways qualify as "original works" connected with Railways and are exempt from service tax in both pre-negative and negative list regimes; corresponding demands were set aside. Commission received from an overseas entity for Business Auxiliary Services was held to qualify as "export of service," nullifying that demand. Amounts relating to staff deputation and equipment hire within a joint venture were held outside the ambit of "service," as no contractor-contractee relationship or quid pro quo existed. Invocation of the extended limitation period and penalty under s.78 Finance Act were rejected. Refund of Rs. 44,66,029/- with interest was ordered.
CESTAT allowed the appeal filed by M/s X against the impugned service tax demand. It held that "flash butt welding" and works contract services executed in relation to Indian Railways qualify as "original works" connected with Railways and are exempt from service tax in both pre-negative and negative list regimes; corresponding demands were set aside. Commission received from an overseas entity for Business Auxiliary Services was held to qualify as "export of service," nullifying that demand. Amounts relating to staff deputation and equipment hire within a joint venture were held outside the ambit of "service," as no contractor-contractee relationship or quid pro quo existed. Invocation of the extended limitation period and penalty under s.78 Finance Act were rejected. Refund of Rs. 44,66,029/- with interest was ordered.
Note: It is a system-generated summary and is for quick reference only.
TaxTMI 
TaxTMI 
