Transfer pricing and tax deductions upheld on established principles, while employee contributions and warranty provisions returned for fresh examinat...
Captive transfer pricing relies on industrial consumer tariffs, while genuine quotations can benchmark effluent treatment transfers under the Other Me...
Specific tariff classification for ophthalmic instruments and extended limitation principles determine the treatment of duty demands, confiscation, an...
Integrated golf function determines classification, placing launch monitors and simulators under other golf equipment rather than measuring instrument...
Public servant status under anti-corruption law extends to recognised stock exchange leadership; constitutional and sanction challenges do not succeed...
Acquiescence, homebuyer protection and clean-slate resolution principles prevent landowners from disrupting an integrated project through late termina...
The ITAT allowed the appeal of the assessee-trust and deleted the addition treating corpus fund donations as taxable income. It held that, the trust being duly registered u/s 12A, voluntary contributions received with a specific direction to form part of the corpus are exempt u/s 11(1)(d). The Tribunal found the assessee had furnished corroborative documentary evidence, and the Revenue failed to disprove or point out any discrepancy. The AO's adverse inference regarding reduction in corpus fund was held to be factually mistaken. The ITAT also accepted the assessee's claim of depreciation and noted the lease deposit payment as properly accounted, thus fully granting the exemption claimed.
The ITAT allowed the appeal of the assessee-trust and deleted the addition treating corpus fund donations as taxable income. It held that, the trust being duly registered u/s 12A, voluntary contributions received with a specific direction to form part of the corpus are exempt u/s 11(1)(d). The Tribunal found the assessee had furnished corroborative documentary evidence, and the Revenue failed to disprove or point out any discrepancy. The AO's adverse inference regarding reduction in corpus fund was held to be factually mistaken. The ITAT also accepted the assessee's claim of depreciation and noted the lease deposit payment as properly accounted, thus fully granting the exemption claimed.
Note: It is a system-generated summary and is for quick reference only.