<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>Tax authority wrongly taxed corpus donations; exemption and depreciation allowed for 12A trust under section 11(1)(d)</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/highlights?id=94400</link>
    <description>The ITAT allowed the appeal of the assessee-trust and deleted the addition treating corpus fund donations as taxable income. It held that, the trust being duly registered u/s 12A, voluntary contributions received with a specific direction to form part of the corpus are exempt u/s 11(1)(d). The Tribunal found the assessee had furnished corroborative documentary evidence, and the Revenue failed to disprove or point out any discrepancy. The AO&#039;s adverse inference regarding reduction in corpus fund was held to be factually mistaken. The ITAT also accepted the assessee&#039;s claim of depreciation and noted the lease deposit payment as properly accounted, thus fully granting the exemption claimed.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Sat, 22 Nov 2025 07:36:35 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Sat, 22 Nov 2025 07:36:37 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=866466" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>Tax authority wrongly taxed corpus donations; exemption and depreciation allowed for 12A trust under section 11(1)(d)</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/highlights?id=94400</link>
      <description>The ITAT allowed the appeal of the assessee-trust and deleted the addition treating corpus fund donations as taxable income. It held that, the trust being duly registered u/s 12A, voluntary contributions received with a specific direction to form part of the corpus are exempt u/s 11(1)(d). The Tribunal found the assessee had furnished corroborative documentary evidence, and the Revenue failed to disprove or point out any discrepancy. The AO&#039;s adverse inference regarding reduction in corpus fund was held to be factually mistaken. The ITAT also accepted the assessee&#039;s claim of depreciation and noted the lease deposit payment as properly accounted, thus fully granting the exemption claimed.</description>
      <category>Highlights</category>
      <law>Income Tax</law>
      <pubDate>Sat, 22 Nov 2025 07:36:35 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/highlights?id=94400</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>