Arrest safeguards and transit remand requirements invalidated detention following inter-State transfer without communicated grounds or magistrate auth...
Arrest safeguards require disclosed grounds, relative intimation and transit remand, while duplicate prosecution under the CGST framework is unsustain...
Document Identification Number defects can invalidate GST assessments, with delayed challenges entertained conditionally where patent irregularities e...
Windmill commissioning evidence supported higher depreciation where grid connection and electricity generation proved operational use before the relev...
Pharmaceutical promotion and transfer-pricing comparability principles limited disallowances, while uncorroborated search allegations and unsupported ...
Business expenditure substantiation supports scrap credits, statutory payments and expense claims, while depreciation requires proof of actual busines...
Page of 4798
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
701 to 720 of 95955 Results
❮
❯
❯❯
0 / 200
Expand Note
Add to Folder
No Folders have been created
+
Are you sure you want to delete "My most important" ?
The ITAT allowed the appeal of the assessee-trust and deleted the addition treating corpus fund donations as taxable income. It held that, the trust being duly registered u/s 12A, voluntary contributions received with a specific direction to form part of the corpus are exempt u/s 11(1)(d). The Tribunal found the assessee had furnished corroborative documentary evidence, and the Revenue failed to disprove or point out any discrepancy. The AO's adverse inference regarding reduction in corpus fund was held to be factually mistaken. The ITAT also accepted the assessee's claim of depreciation and noted the lease deposit payment as properly accounted, thus fully granting the exemption claimed.
The ITAT allowed the appeal of the assessee-trust and deleted the addition treating corpus fund donations as taxable income. It held that, the trust being duly registered u/s 12A, voluntary contributions received with a specific direction to form part of the corpus are exempt u/s 11(1)(d). The Tribunal found the assessee had furnished corroborative documentary evidence, and the Revenue failed to disprove or point out any discrepancy. The AO's adverse inference regarding reduction in corpus fund was held to be factually mistaken. The ITAT also accepted the assessee's claim of depreciation and noted the lease deposit payment as properly accounted, thus fully granting the exemption claimed.
Note: It is a system-generated summary and is for quick reference only.
TaxTMI 
of 4798
Join Channel
TaxTMI 
