Governmental authority status supports construction-service exemption, while pre-cutoff contract and stamp-duty compliance requires verification on re...
Automated Free Sale and Commerce Certificates enable paperless processing while retaining risk-based manual verification for selected exporter applica...
Employee stock-shortage penalties do not constitute consideration for services, preventing GST collection under Schedule II in employment relationship...
ITAT upheld the addition made under the head "Income from other sources" in respect of interest received under s.28 of the Land Acquisition Act, treating it as taxable u/s 56(2)(viii) read with s.145B(1) for the post-01.04.2010 assessment year in question. The agricultural land compensation itself remained exempt u/s 10(37), but the interest component was held separately chargeable on receipt basis. ITAT ruled that earlier Supreme Court jurisprudence characterising such interest as part of compensation applied only to the pre-amendment regime and cannot override the explicit charging provisions inserted by the Finance Act, 2010. Arguments based on Hari Singh, Braham Prakash and the per incuriam doctrine were rejected, and the High Court decisions upholding post-amendment taxability were followed. The assessee's appeal was dismissed.
ITAT upheld the addition made under the head "Income from other sources" in respect of interest received under s.28 of the Land Acquisition Act, treating it as taxable u/s 56(2)(viii) read with s.145B(1) for the post-01.04.2010 assessment year in question. The agricultural land compensation itself remained exempt u/s 10(37), but the interest component was held separately chargeable on receipt basis. ITAT ruled that earlier Supreme Court jurisprudence characterising such interest as part of compensation applied only to the pre-amendment regime and cannot override the explicit charging provisions inserted by the Finance Act, 2010. Arguments based on Hari Singh, Braham Prakash and the per incuriam doctrine were rejected, and the High Court decisions upholding post-amendment taxability were followed. The assessee's appeal was dismissed.
Note: It is a system-generated summary and is for quick reference only.