Transaction value rejection requires reliable corroboration; refundable VAT is excluded and temporary registration does not defeat new-vehicle exempti...
Appellate jurisdiction remains available where a wrist-worn gold ornament cannot conclusively be characterised as imported baggage at the preliminary ...
Written complaint requirement bars cognizance on police reports for securities offences, while unsupported breach of trust and cheating allegations fa...
Risk-based postal import clearance standardises electronic assessment, document requests, duty realisation and delivery controls at Foreign Post Offic...
Customs Cargo Service Provider appointment extends custodianship to additional terminal land, subject to cargo-control, security and licence condition...
Page of 4790
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
141 to 160 of 95794 Results
❮
❯
❯❯
0 / 200
Expand Note
Add to Folder
No Folders have been created
+
Are you sure you want to delete "My most important" ?
The AT upheld the provisional attachment order under the Prevention of Money-Laundering framework, dismissing the appeals. The tribunal found that the assets of the director and relatives were properly treated as "proceeds of crime" within the statutory definition, including application of the second limb permitting attachment of property acquired prior to the offence when equivalent proceeds are unavailable or have been siphoned off. The AT declined to disturb the impugned order after applying settled judicial principles and authoritative precedent, concluding the attachment was justified on the record of alleged irregular loans, overvaluation and misappropriation. The appeals consequently fail and are dismissed.
The AT upheld the provisional attachment order under the Prevention of Money-Laundering framework, dismissing the appeals. The tribunal found that the assets of the director and relatives were properly treated as "proceeds of crime" within the statutory definition, including application of the second limb permitting attachment of property acquired prior to the offence when equivalent proceeds are unavailable or have been siphoned off. The AT declined to disturb the impugned order after applying settled judicial principles and authoritative precedent, concluding the attachment was justified on the record of alleged irregular loans, overvaluation and misappropriation. The appeals consequently fail and are dismissed.
Note: It is a system-generated summary and is for quick reference only.