Just a moment...

Top
Help
Upgrade to AI Search

We've upgraded AI Search on TaxTMI with two powerful modes:

1. Basic
Quick overview summary answering your query with referencesCategory-wise results to explore all relevant documents on TaxTMI

2. Advanced
• Includes everything in Basic
Detailed report covering:
     -   Overview Summary
     -   Governing Provisions [Acts, Notifications, Circulars]
     -   Relevant Case Laws
     -   Tariff / Classification / HSN
     -   Expert views from TaxTMI
     -   Practical Guidance with immediate steps and dispute strategy

• Also highlights how each document is relevant to your query, helping you quickly understand key insights without reading the full text.Help Us Improve - by giving the rating with each AI Result:

Explore AI Search

Powered by Weblekha - Building Scalable Websites

×

By creating an account you can:

Logo TaxTMI
>
Call Us / Help / Feedback

Contact Us At :

E-mail: [email protected]

Call / WhatsApp at: +91 99117 96707

For more information, Check Contact Us

FAQs :

To know Frequently Asked Questions, Check FAQs

Most Asked Video Tutorials :

For more tutorials, Check Video Tutorials

Submit Feedback/Suggestion :

Email :
Please provide your email address so we can follow up on your feedback.
Category :
Description :
Min 15 characters0/2000
TMI Blog
Home / RSS

Provisional attachment under Prevention of Money-Laundering upheld as directors' and relatives' assets treated as proceeds of crime

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

Full Text of the Document

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

....The AT upheld the provisional attachment order under the Prevention of Money-Laundering framework, dismissing the appeals. The tribunal found that the assets of the director and relatives were properly treated as "proceeds of crime" within the statutory definition, including application of the second limb permitting attachment of property acquired prior to the offence when equivalent proceeds are unavailable or have been siphoned off. The AT declined to disturb the impugned order after applying settled judicial principles and authoritative precedent, concluding the attachment was justified on the record of alleged irregular loans, overvaluation and misappropriation. The appeals consequently fail and are dismissed.....