Jurisdictional facts in certificate-of-origin discrepancies can support customs show-cause proceedings, leaving factual explanations for departmental ...
Market value for captive electricity consumption follows industrial consumer tariffs, supporting profit computation for the power generation deduction...
The AT upheld the provisional attachment order under the Prevention of Money-Laundering framework, dismissing the appeals. The tribunal found that the assets of the director and relatives were properly treated as "proceeds of crime" within the statutory definition, including application of the second limb permitting attachment of property acquired prior to the offence when equivalent proceeds are unavailable or have been siphoned off. The AT declined to disturb the impugned order after applying settled judicial principles and authoritative precedent, concluding the attachment was justified on the record of alleged irregular loans, overvaluation and misappropriation. The appeals consequently fail and are dismissed.
The AT upheld the provisional attachment order under the Prevention of Money-Laundering framework, dismissing the appeals. The tribunal found that the assets of the director and relatives were properly treated as "proceeds of crime" within the statutory definition, including application of the second limb permitting attachment of property acquired prior to the offence when equivalent proceeds are unavailable or have been siphoned off. The AT declined to disturb the impugned order after applying settled judicial principles and authoritative precedent, concluding the attachment was justified on the record of alleged irregular loans, overvaluation and misappropriation. The appeals consequently fail and are dismissed.
Note: It is a system-generated summary and is for quick reference only.