Rectification of mistake remains limited to self-evident record errors, preventing merits review through miscellaneous applications and preserving fin...
Tender creditworthiness conditions may extend to de facto Promoter Directors, with post-participation challenges generally barred absent arbitrariness...
Corporate representation in PMLA summons proceedings permitted through an authorised signatory, subject to directors' continuing cooperation and atten...
Helicopter charter classification requires effective control analysis, while territorial performance, reasoned credit orders and wilful suppression de...
Specified fund definition expands PAN exemption eligibility for registered alternative investment funds and qualifying International Financial Service...
Tax exemption for specified legal-services authority income applies retrospectively, subject to non-commercial activity, unchanged income sources, and...
The AT upheld the provisional attachment order under the Prevention of Money-Laundering framework, dismissing the appeals. The tribunal found that the assets of the director and relatives were properly treated as "proceeds of crime" within the statutory definition, including application of the second limb permitting attachment of property acquired prior to the offence when equivalent proceeds are unavailable or have been siphoned off. The AT declined to disturb the impugned order after applying settled judicial principles and authoritative precedent, concluding the attachment was justified on the record of alleged irregular loans, overvaluation and misappropriation. The appeals consequently fail and are dismissed.
The AT upheld the provisional attachment order under the Prevention of Money-Laundering framework, dismissing the appeals. The tribunal found that the assets of the director and relatives were properly treated as "proceeds of crime" within the statutory definition, including application of the second limb permitting attachment of property acquired prior to the offence when equivalent proceeds are unavailable or have been siphoned off. The AT declined to disturb the impugned order after applying settled judicial principles and authoritative precedent, concluding the attachment was justified on the record of alleged irregular loans, overvaluation and misappropriation. The appeals consequently fail and are dismissed.
Note: It is a system-generated summary and is for quick reference only.