Charitable trust registration requires a specified-violation notice; settled cash deposits and related-party payments did not justify cancellation or ...
External development charges trigger TDS under section 194C, while disputed administrative payments require factual verification and fresh adjudicatio...
Section 270AA penalty immunity requires identified statutory defaults and a hearing before rejection; reassessment disclosure may constitute under-rep...
Section 80JJAA employee-cost deduction allowed for deployed staff but barred against transfer-pricing income enhancement, with pricing issues remanded...
Transfer-pricing methodology protects commercially genuine associated-enterprise payments, while pre-2016 secondary adjustments and related notional i...
Negative liens over operating assets can constitute international transactions requiring arm's-length pricing reflecting restricted borrowing and expa...
Cross-examination rights in Customs Broker revocation inquiries require witness examination; procedural denial may be cured through fresh adjudication...
HC held that the SVLDRS proceedings under Chapter V of the Finance Act, 2019 and its Rules are adjudicatory in character and governed by statutory procedure, entitling the petitioner to relief based on the Supreme Court's extension of limitation. The writ petition was allowed: Exts. P5 and P8 were quashed and the competent officer was directed to treat the payment remitted by the petitioner on 16.11.2020 as compliance with Chapter V of the Act and to issue a certificate in Form SVLDRS-4. The decision affirms that the designated authority must determine liability in accordance with statutory provisions, affording procedural safeguards and opportunity to be heard.
HC held that the SVLDRS proceedings under Chapter V of the Finance Act, 2019 and its Rules are adjudicatory in character and governed by statutory procedure, entitling the petitioner to relief based on the Supreme Court's extension of limitation. The writ petition was allowed: Exts. P5 and P8 were quashed and the competent officer was directed to treat the payment remitted by the petitioner on 16.11.2020 as compliance with Chapter V of the Act and to issue a certificate in Form SVLDRS-4. The decision affirms that the designated authority must determine liability in accordance with statutory provisions, affording procedural safeguards and opportunity to be heard.
Note: It is a system-generated summary and is for quick reference only.