Tax appeal allowed: AO exceeded s.144C DRP mandate by introducing new findings and recharacterising non-resident receipts as permanent establishment i...
Anonymized petitioner gets partial relief: bank guarantee quashed, PVC-coated fabric released under reduced conditions while valuation proceedings con...
HC held that the SVLDRS proceedings under Chapter V of the Finance Act, 2019 and its Rules are adjudicatory in character and governed by statutory procedure, entitling the petitioner to relief based on the Supreme Court's extension of limitation. The writ petition was allowed: Exts. P5 and P8 were quashed and the competent officer was directed to treat the payment remitted by the petitioner on 16.11.2020 as compliance with Chapter V of the Act and to issue a certificate in Form SVLDRS-4. The decision affirms that the designated authority must determine liability in accordance with statutory provisions, affording procedural safeguards and opportunity to be heard.
HC held that the SVLDRS proceedings under Chapter V of the Finance Act, 2019 and its Rules are adjudicatory in character and governed by statutory procedure, entitling the petitioner to relief based on the Supreme Court's extension of limitation. The writ petition was allowed: Exts. P5 and P8 were quashed and the competent officer was directed to treat the payment remitted by the petitioner on 16.11.2020 as compliance with Chapter V of the Act and to issue a certificate in Form SVLDRS-4. The decision affirms that the designated authority must determine liability in accordance with statutory provisions, affording procedural safeguards and opportunity to be heard.
Note: It is a system-generated summary and is for quick reference only.
TaxTMI 
TaxTMI 
of 4819 
Join Channel 
