Refund claim dismissed as time-barred under s.142(5); non-obstante clause read restrictively, merits not decided, self-assessment payments not mere de...
Assessee's project-completion revenue recognition upheld; income addition deleted under Guidance Note/AS-9 and percentage-completion rules as complian...
The HC quashed the impugned SVLDRS-3 to the extent it directed the anonymized petitioner to pay Rs.1,12,65,902/-, holding that the authorities failed to examine and verify challans and payments produced by the petitioner within the timelines and the respondents' own show-cause process. The SVLDRS-3 determination is set aside, and the matter is remitted for de novo verification by the designated committee of the petitioner's claims regarding pre-deposits and amounts recovered during investigations; if verification under Section 124(2) establishes entitlement, such amounts must be adjusted in computing liability under the scheme. Petition allowed.
The HC quashed the impugned SVLDRS-3 to the extent it directed the anonymized petitioner to pay Rs.1,12,65,902/-, holding that the authorities failed to examine and verify challans and payments produced by the petitioner within the timelines and the respondents' own show-cause process. The SVLDRS-3 determination is set aside, and the matter is remitted for de novo verification by the designated committee of the petitioner's claims regarding pre-deposits and amounts recovered during investigations; if verification under Section 124(2) establishes entitlement, such amounts must be adjusted in computing liability under the scheme. Petition allowed.
Note: It is a system-generated summary and is for quick reference only.
TaxTMI 
TaxTMI 
of 4821 
Join Channel 
