Introducing the “In Favour Of” filter in Case Laws.
- ⚖️ Instantly identify judgments decided in favour of the Assessee, Revenue, or Appellant
- 🔍 Narrow down results with higher precision
Try it now in Case Laws →
TaxTMI Login
🚀 New Feature Launched ✕
Just a moment...
Introducing the “In Favour Of” filter in Case Laws.
Try it now in Case Laws →
Press 'Enter' to add multiple search terms. Rules for Better Search
of 
of 
No Folders have been created
Are you sure you want to delete "My most important" ?
NOTE:
of of 
All Highlights
of of All Highlights
Note
Bookmark
Share
Don't have an account? Register Here
of The HC quashed the impugned SVLDRS-3 to the extent it directed the anonymized petitioner to pay Rs.1,12,65,902/-, holding that the authorities failed to examine and verify challans and payments produced by the petitioner within the timelines and the respondents' own show-cause process. The SVLDRS-3 determination is set aside, and the matter is remitted for de novo verification by the designated committee of the petitioner's claims regarding pre-deposits and amounts recovered during investigations; if verification under Section 124(2) establishes entitlement, such amounts must be adjusted in computing liability under the scheme. Petition allowed.
TaxTMI 
TaxTMI 
