ESOP expenditure allowed as FMV difference; long-term capital gain issue sent back for collector rate determination; deferred income additions disallo...
Appeal allowed; impugned order quashed as regulator failed to prove nexus or manipulative scheme; sale genuine - s.12A(a)-(c), Regs 3(a)-(d),4(1),4(2)...
Appellant's ring-back tone service held OIDAR, taxable domestically for 01.07.2012-31.07.2016; liability confirmed, penalties vacated, remanded for re...
The HC quashed the impugned SVLDRS-3 to the extent it directed the anonymized petitioner to pay Rs.1,12,65,902/-, holding that the authorities failed to examine and verify challans and payments produced by the petitioner within the timelines and the respondents' own show-cause process. The SVLDRS-3 determination is set aside, and the matter is remitted for de novo verification by the designated committee of the petitioner's claims regarding pre-deposits and amounts recovered during investigations; if verification under Section 124(2) establishes entitlement, such amounts must be adjusted in computing liability under the scheme. Petition allowed.
The HC quashed the impugned SVLDRS-3 to the extent it directed the anonymized petitioner to pay Rs.1,12,65,902/-, holding that the authorities failed to examine and verify challans and payments produced by the petitioner within the timelines and the respondents' own show-cause process. The SVLDRS-3 determination is set aside, and the matter is remitted for de novo verification by the designated committee of the petitioner's claims regarding pre-deposits and amounts recovered during investigations; if verification under Section 124(2) establishes entitlement, such amounts must be adjusted in computing liability under the scheme. Petition allowed.
Note: It is a system-generated summary and is for quick reference only.
TaxTMI 
TaxTMI 
of 4819 
Join Channel 
