Electronic WhatsApp evidence without authentication or independent corroboration cannot sustain an unexplained-investment addition based on third-part...
Mutual current-account transactions excluded from deemed dividend treatment where no fresh borrowing arose; unsupported unsecured-loan addition also f...
The HC quashed the impugned SVLDRS-3 to the extent it directed the anonymized petitioner to pay Rs.1,12,65,902/-, holding that the authorities failed to examine and verify challans and payments produced by the petitioner within the timelines and the respondents' own show-cause process. The SVLDRS-3 determination is set aside, and the matter is remitted for de novo verification by the designated committee of the petitioner's claims regarding pre-deposits and amounts recovered during investigations; if verification under Section 124(2) establishes entitlement, such amounts must be adjusted in computing liability under the scheme. Petition allowed.
The HC quashed the impugned SVLDRS-3 to the extent it directed the anonymized petitioner to pay Rs.1,12,65,902/-, holding that the authorities failed to examine and verify challans and payments produced by the petitioner within the timelines and the respondents' own show-cause process. The SVLDRS-3 determination is set aside, and the matter is remitted for de novo verification by the designated committee of the petitioner's claims regarding pre-deposits and amounts recovered during investigations; if verification under Section 124(2) establishes entitlement, such amounts must be adjusted in computing liability under the scheme. Petition allowed.
Note: It is a system-generated summary and is for quick reference only.
TaxTMI 
TaxTMI 
of 4828 
Join Channel 
