Charitable trust registration requires a specified-violation notice; settled cash deposits and related-party payments did not justify cancellation or ...
External development charges trigger TDS under section 194C, while disputed administrative payments require factual verification and fresh adjudicatio...
Section 270AA penalty immunity requires identified statutory defaults and a hearing before rejection; reassessment disclosure may constitute under-rep...
Section 80JJAA employee-cost deduction allowed for deployed staff but barred against transfer-pricing income enhancement, with pricing issues remanded...
Transfer-pricing methodology protects commercially genuine associated-enterprise payments, while pre-2016 secondary adjustments and related notional i...
Negative liens over operating assets can constitute international transactions requiring arm's-length pricing reflecting restricted borrowing and expa...
Cross-examination rights in Customs Broker revocation inquiries require witness examination; procedural denial may be cured through fresh adjudication...
ITAT dismissed both appeals and affirmed the appellate order: the AO's addition under s.69B relating to the cost of cold storage structure was set aside because the CIT(A) properly accepted the DVO's revised valuation report after the DVO considered the assessee's objections, and the minor variation in the revised report did not warrant addition. The CIT(A)'s deletion of the impugned addition was endorsed. With respect to unexplained investment in plant and machinery, the CIT(A)'s decision to uphold the assessment was retained. Consequently, the assessee's appeals are dismissed and the Revenue's appeal is also dismissed.
ITAT dismissed both appeals and affirmed the appellate order: the AO's addition under s.69B relating to the cost of cold storage structure was set aside because the CIT(A) properly accepted the DVO's revised valuation report after the DVO considered the assessee's objections, and the minor variation in the revised report did not warrant addition. The CIT(A)'s deletion of the impugned addition was endorsed. With respect to unexplained investment in plant and machinery, the CIT(A)'s decision to uphold the assessment was retained. Consequently, the assessee's appeals are dismissed and the Revenue's appeal is also dismissed.
Note: It is a system-generated summary and is for quick reference only.