<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>Appeals dismissed; s.69B addition for cold storage cost set aside as revised DVO valuation accepted, investment findings upheld</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/highlights?id=94137</link>
    <description>ITAT dismissed both appeals and affirmed the appellate order: the AO&#039;s addition under s.69B relating to the cost of cold storage structure was set aside because the CIT(A) properly accepted the DVO&#039;s revised valuation report after the DVO considered the assessee&#039;s objections, and the minor variation in the revised report did not warrant addition. The CIT(A)&#039;s deletion of the impugned addition was endorsed. With respect to unexplained investment in plant and machinery, the CIT(A)&#039;s decision to uphold the assessment was retained. Consequently, the assessee&#039;s appeals are dismissed and the Revenue&#039;s appeal is also dismissed.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Thu, 13 Nov 2025 08:14:51 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Thu, 13 Nov 2025 08:14:53 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=864273" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>Appeals dismissed; s.69B addition for cold storage cost set aside as revised DVO valuation accepted, investment findings upheld</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/highlights?id=94137</link>
      <description>ITAT dismissed both appeals and affirmed the appellate order: the AO&#039;s addition under s.69B relating to the cost of cold storage structure was set aside because the CIT(A) properly accepted the DVO&#039;s revised valuation report after the DVO considered the assessee&#039;s objections, and the minor variation in the revised report did not warrant addition. The CIT(A)&#039;s deletion of the impugned addition was endorsed. With respect to unexplained investment in plant and machinery, the CIT(A)&#039;s decision to uphold the assessment was retained. Consequently, the assessee&#039;s appeals are dismissed and the Revenue&#039;s appeal is also dismissed.</description>
      <category>Highlights</category>
      <law>Income Tax</law>
      <pubDate>Thu, 13 Nov 2025 08:14:51 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/highlights?id=94137</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>