Service of notice and contractual debt acknowledgment preserved insolvency admission against a corporate guarantor despite limitation and natural just...
Original works exemption excludes standalone boulder transportation, leaving subcontracted railway-project transport services subject to service tax l...
Annual production capacity determinations excluding stenter galleries support refunds for unconstitutional excise levies without an unjust-enrichment ...
Vicarious liability for cheque dishonour requires specific allegations of responsibility and cheque signatory; generic director allegations cannot sus...
IT Resilience Index requires market infrastructure institutions to automate resilience scoring, early warnings, and continuous service-delivery monito...
AT partly allowed the appeal and directed the respondent to permit inspection and production of investigatory material to the appellant to the extent necessary to test the charges. The respondent must provide the chats between the appellant and any entity, copies of statements of fund managers, documents seized from the appellant's desk, the daily register maintained by the asset manager, and the appellant's trade logs and the Big Client's trade details limited to scrip, quantum and time of order placement. Entire third-party chats may be withheld to protect privacy. The respondent's reliance on call data records was rejected and the appellant is entitled to his call details. No direction is given concerning production of a Section 65B certificate.
AT partly allowed the appeal and directed the respondent to permit inspection and production of investigatory material to the appellant to the extent necessary to test the charges. The respondent must provide the chats between the appellant and any entity, copies of statements of fund managers, documents seized from the appellant's desk, the daily register maintained by the asset manager, and the appellant's trade logs and the Big Client's trade details limited to scrip, quantum and time of order placement. Entire third-party chats may be withheld to protect privacy. The respondent's reliance on call data records was rejected and the appellant is entitled to his call details. No direction is given concerning production of a Section 65B certificate.
Note: It is a system-generated summary and is for quick reference only.