Charitable trust registration requires a specified-violation notice; settled cash deposits and related-party payments did not justify cancellation or ...
External development charges trigger TDS under section 194C, while disputed administrative payments require factual verification and fresh adjudicatio...
Section 270AA penalty immunity requires identified statutory defaults and a hearing before rejection; reassessment disclosure may constitute under-rep...
Section 80JJAA employee-cost deduction allowed for deployed staff but barred against transfer-pricing income enhancement, with pricing issues remanded...
Transfer-pricing methodology protects commercially genuine associated-enterprise payments, while pre-2016 secondary adjustments and related notional i...
Negative liens over operating assets can constitute international transactions requiring arm's-length pricing reflecting restricted borrowing and expa...
Cross-examination rights in Customs Broker revocation inquiries require witness examination; procedural denial may be cured through fresh adjudication...
NCLAT upheld the Adjudicating Authority's finding that the 25.08.2009 Deed of Guarantee was a continuing, irrevocable guarantee binding the guarantor for subsequent renewals and variations under its express clauses; consequently the guarantor remained liable for obligations arising after variations. The tribunal rejected the appellant's contention that resignation from directorship or selective clause reading discharged the guarantee, and found no procedural prejudice in consideration of the Additional Report. Debt and default under the guarantee were established and initiation of CIRP against the appellant was affirmed, subject to limitation of the appellant's liability to Rs. 3.84 crore as stipulated in the 2009 Deed; appeal disposed.
NCLAT upheld the Adjudicating Authority's finding that the 25.08.2009 Deed of Guarantee was a continuing, irrevocable guarantee binding the guarantor for subsequent renewals and variations under its express clauses; consequently the guarantor remained liable for obligations arising after variations. The tribunal rejected the appellant's contention that resignation from directorship or selective clause reading discharged the guarantee, and found no procedural prejudice in consideration of the Additional Report. Debt and default under the guarantee were established and initiation of CIRP against the appellant was affirmed, subject to limitation of the appellant's liability to Rs. 3.84 crore as stipulated in the 2009 Deed; appeal disposed.
Note: It is a system-generated summary and is for quick reference only.
TaxTMI 
TaxTMI 
of 4827 
Join Channel 
