ESOP expenditure allowed as FMV difference; long-term capital gain issue sent back for collector rate determination; deferred income additions disallo...
Appeal allowed; impugned order quashed as regulator failed to prove nexus or manipulative scheme; sale genuine - s.12A(a)-(c), Regs 3(a)-(d),4(1),4(2)...
Appellant's ring-back tone service held OIDAR, taxable domestically for 01.07.2012-31.07.2016; liability confirmed, penalties vacated, remanded for re...
NCLAT dismissed the Company Appeal for want of merit and declined condonation relief, holding that the Appellant, having withdrawn the related Company Appeal arising from IA No. 419/2024, lacks locus to impugn the order on IA No. 805/2024. The Tribunal observed the relief sought in IA No. 805/2024 mirrored that in IA No. 419/2024 and was bound by directions issued on IA No. 419/2024. Further, the Appellant participated in the final round of the challenge process without contemporaneous objection and the resolution plan has been approved under Section 30(6) read with Section 60(5) of the IBC, leaving no subsisting cause of action; appeal dismissed.
NCLAT dismissed the Company Appeal for want of merit and declined condonation relief, holding that the Appellant, having withdrawn the related Company Appeal arising from IA No. 419/2024, lacks locus to impugn the order on IA No. 805/2024. The Tribunal observed the relief sought in IA No. 805/2024 mirrored that in IA No. 419/2024 and was bound by directions issued on IA No. 419/2024. Further, the Appellant participated in the final round of the challenge process without contemporaneous objection and the resolution plan has been approved under Section 30(6) read with Section 60(5) of the IBC, leaving no subsisting cause of action; appeal dismissed.
Note: It is a system-generated summary and is for quick reference only.
TaxTMI 
TaxTMI 
of 4819 
Join Channel 
