Introducing the βIn Favour Ofβ filter in Case Laws.
- βοΈ Instantly identify judgments decided in favour of the Assessee, Revenue, or Appellant
- π Narrow down results with higher precision
Try it now in Case Laws β


Just a moment...
Introducing the βIn Favour Ofβ filter in Case Laws.
Try it now in Case Laws β


Press 'Enter' to add multiple search terms. Rules for Better Search
No Folders have been created
Are you sure you want to delete "My most important" ?
NOTE:
Don't have an account? Register Here
NCLAT dismissed the Company Appeal for want of merit and declined condonation relief, holding that the Appellant, having withdrawn the related Company Appeal arising from IA No. 419/2024, lacks locus to impugn the order on IA No. 805/2024. The Tribunal observed the relief sought in IA No. 805/2024 mirrored that in IA No. 419/2024 and was bound by directions issued on IA No. 419/2024. Further, the Appellant participated in the final round of the challenge process without contemporaneous objection and the resolution plan has been approved under Section 30(6) read with Section 60(5) of the IBC, leaving no subsisting cause of action; appeal dismissed.