Alternative statutory remedy and unexplained delay barred writ review of customs confiscation adjudication, leaving merits for appellate consideration...
Authorised courier due diligence protects against penalties where declared exports conceal prohibited goods despite proper documentation and customs p...
Customs-controlled container movement now extends to DP World facilities, subject to segregation, inspections, reconciliation, and EXIM cargo priority...
ITAT allowed the appeal for statistical purposes, holding that the CIT(A) exceeded the remit of the proviso to s.251(1)(a) by directing a de novo reassessment when the default related solely to disallowance under s.36(1)(iii). The Tribunal restrained the remand to the discrete issue of s.36(1)(iii) disallowance: it directed deletion of the disallowance insofar as impugned investments fall within the doctrine of commercial expediency and are consistent with prior treatment, and restored remaining investments to the AO for limited verification confined to linkage with interest-free funds and the validity of the s.36(1)(iii) disallowance.
ITAT allowed the appeal for statistical purposes, holding that the CIT(A) exceeded the remit of the proviso to s.251(1)(a) by directing a de novo reassessment when the default related solely to disallowance under s.36(1)(iii). The Tribunal restrained the remand to the discrete issue of s.36(1)(iii) disallowance: it directed deletion of the disallowance insofar as impugned investments fall within the doctrine of commercial expediency and are consistent with prior treatment, and restored remaining investments to the AO for limited verification confined to linkage with interest-free funds and the validity of the s.36(1)(iii) disallowance.
Note: It is a system-generated summary and is for quick reference only.
TaxTMI 
TaxTMI 
of 4827 
Join Channel 
