Charitable trust registration requires a specified-violation notice; settled cash deposits and related-party payments did not justify cancellation or ...
External development charges trigger TDS under section 194C, while disputed administrative payments require factual verification and fresh adjudicatio...
Section 270AA penalty immunity requires identified statutory defaults and a hearing before rejection; reassessment disclosure may constitute under-rep...
Section 80JJAA employee-cost deduction allowed for deployed staff but barred against transfer-pricing income enhancement, with pricing issues remanded...
Transfer-pricing methodology protects commercially genuine associated-enterprise payments, while pre-2016 secondary adjustments and related notional i...
Negative liens over operating assets can constitute international transactions requiring arm's-length pricing reflecting restricted borrowing and expa...
Cross-examination rights in Customs Broker revocation inquiries require witness examination; procedural denial may be cured through fresh adjudication...
The SC dismissed the SLP, holding the petitioner's election void for failure to disclose a conviction under s.138 of the Negotiable Instruments Act in the affidavit mandated by Rule 24-A(1) of the Municipal Election Rules, 1994. Rule 24-A(1) was treated as valid and mandatory; nondisclosure of a sentence of one year or more constituted suppression of material information, rendering acceptance of the nomination improper and materially affecting the election. Subsequent acquittal on appeal (occurring after the election) did not cure the prior nondisclosure, and no exceptional circumstances justified condonation. Although bye-elections were held and the challenge was rendered largely infructuous, the petitioner's rights were preserved by an interim order, yet relief was denied.
The SC dismissed the SLP, holding the petitioner's election void for failure to disclose a conviction under s.138 of the Negotiable Instruments Act in the affidavit mandated by Rule 24-A(1) of the Municipal Election Rules, 1994. Rule 24-A(1) was treated as valid and mandatory; nondisclosure of a sentence of one year or more constituted suppression of material information, rendering acceptance of the nomination improper and materially affecting the election. Subsequent acquittal on appeal (occurring after the election) did not cure the prior nondisclosure, and no exceptional circumstances justified condonation. Although bye-elections were held and the challenge was rendered largely infructuous, the petitioner's rights were preserved by an interim order, yet relief was denied.
Note: It is a system-generated summary and is for quick reference only.
TaxTMI 
TaxTMI 
of 4828 
Join Channel 
