Charitable trust registration requires a specified-violation notice; settled cash deposits and related-party payments did not justify cancellation or ...
External development charges trigger TDS under section 194C, while disputed administrative payments require factual verification and fresh adjudicatio...
Section 270AA penalty immunity requires identified statutory defaults and a hearing before rejection; reassessment disclosure may constitute under-rep...
Section 80JJAA employee-cost deduction allowed for deployed staff but barred against transfer-pricing income enhancement, with pricing issues remanded...
Transfer-pricing methodology protects commercially genuine associated-enterprise payments, while pre-2016 secondary adjustments and related notional i...
Negative liens over operating assets can constitute international transactions requiring arm's-length pricing reflecting restricted borrowing and expa...
Cross-examination rights in Customs Broker revocation inquiries require witness examination; procedural denial may be cured through fresh adjudication...
The AT upheld findings that the Appellant diverted duty-free imported silk yarn to the domestic market and exported non-declared goods, constituting contraventions of s.3(b) and s.3(d) of FEMA, and confirmed liability for both contraventions. Noting humanitarian and economic considerations, the AT reiterated an earlier waiver of the pre-deposit requirement and, on merits, reduced the cumulative penalty from Rs.12,00,000 to Rs.6,00,000, apportioned at Rs.3,00,000 for each contravention. The appeal was partly allowed to the extent of penalty reduction; all parties are anonymized and the substantive finding of misuse of 100% EOU entitlements and resultant foreign exchange ramifications was maintained.
The AT upheld findings that the Appellant diverted duty-free imported silk yarn to the domestic market and exported non-declared goods, constituting contraventions of s.3(b) and s.3(d) of FEMA, and confirmed liability for both contraventions. Noting humanitarian and economic considerations, the AT reiterated an earlier waiver of the pre-deposit requirement and, on merits, reduced the cumulative penalty from Rs.12,00,000 to Rs.6,00,000, apportioned at Rs.3,00,000 for each contravention. The appeal was partly allowed to the extent of penalty reduction; all parties are anonymized and the substantive finding of misuse of 100% EOU entitlements and resultant foreign exchange ramifications was maintained.
Note: It is a system-generated summary and is for quick reference only.