<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>Appeal partly allowed: Penalty halved for diverting duty-free silk yarn and undeclared exports under s.3(b) and s.3(d) FEMA</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/highlights?id=93977</link>
    <description>The AT upheld findings that the Appellant diverted duty-free imported silk yarn to the domestic market and exported non-declared goods, constituting contraventions of s.3(b) and s.3(d) of FEMA, and confirmed liability for both contraventions. Noting humanitarian and economic considerations, the AT reiterated an earlier waiver of the pre-deposit requirement and, on merits, reduced the cumulative penalty from Rs.12,00,000 to Rs.6,00,000, apportioned at Rs.3,00,000 for each contravention. The appeal was partly allowed to the extent of penalty reduction; all parties are anonymized and the substantive finding of misuse of 100% EOU entitlements and resultant foreign exchange ramifications was maintained.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Sat, 08 Nov 2025 08:30:03 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Sat, 08 Nov 2025 08:30:04 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=863187" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>Appeal partly allowed: Penalty halved for diverting duty-free silk yarn and undeclared exports under s.3(b) and s.3(d) FEMA</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/highlights?id=93977</link>
      <description>The AT upheld findings that the Appellant diverted duty-free imported silk yarn to the domestic market and exported non-declared goods, constituting contraventions of s.3(b) and s.3(d) of FEMA, and confirmed liability for both contraventions. Noting humanitarian and economic considerations, the AT reiterated an earlier waiver of the pre-deposit requirement and, on merits, reduced the cumulative penalty from Rs.12,00,000 to Rs.6,00,000, apportioned at Rs.3,00,000 for each contravention. The appeal was partly allowed to the extent of penalty reduction; all parties are anonymized and the substantive finding of misuse of 100% EOU entitlements and resultant foreign exchange ramifications was maintained.</description>
      <category>Highlights</category>
      <law>FEMA</law>
      <pubDate>Sat, 08 Nov 2025 08:30:03 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/highlights?id=93977</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>