Tax appeal allowed: AO exceeded s.144C DRP mandate by introducing new findings and recharacterising non-resident receipts as permanent establishment i...
Anonymized petitioner gets partial relief: bank guarantee quashed, PVC-coated fabric released under reduced conditions while valuation proceedings con...
CESTAT upheld recovery of drawback under Rules 16 and 16A of the Drawback Rules, 1995 read with s.75 of the Customs Act, 1962, holding that recovery (with interest) was sustainable where sale proceeds were not genuinely realised from the purported buyers and remittances could not be accepted as proceeds; the Tribunal found the DRI conducted independent enquiries and issued an SCN without undue delay and that no limitation is prescribed for such recovery. The Tribunal set aside the penalty imposed under s.114(i) and (iii). Consequentially the appeal is allowed in part: recovery with interest sustained; penalty under s.114 vacated.
CESTAT upheld recovery of drawback under Rules 16 and 16A of the Drawback Rules, 1995 read with s.75 of the Customs Act, 1962, holding that recovery (with interest) was sustainable where sale proceeds were not genuinely realised from the purported buyers and remittances could not be accepted as proceeds; the Tribunal found the DRI conducted independent enquiries and issued an SCN without undue delay and that no limitation is prescribed for such recovery. The Tribunal set aside the penalty imposed under s.114(i) and (iii). Consequentially the appeal is allowed in part: recovery with interest sustained; penalty under s.114 vacated.
Note: It is a system-generated summary and is for quick reference only.
TaxTMI 
TaxTMI 
of 4824 
Join Channel 
