Transfer-pricing treatment of ITeS margins excludes pass-through tax recoveries and separate delayed-receivables interest after working-capital adjust...
Capacity-utilisation adjustments under TNMM can neutralise substantiated COVID-related idle costs where underutilisation materially affects profitabil...
TNMM functional comparability requires excluding rice manufacturers from a pure Basmati rice trader's benchmark and recognising operating export recei...
Working-capital adjustment subsumes delayed-receivable effects in TNMM benchmarking of captive software-development services, avoiding separate notion...
Transfer-pricing comparability requires exclusion of financially illogical super-profit comparables and correction of unsupported annual-report and ma...
Charitable character assessment preserves Section 80G approval despite inclusive spiritual teachings and incidental religious expenditure within the s...
Penalty proceedings for cash-loan acceptance require assessment proceedings and recorded Assessing Officer satisfaction; absent these, the proceedings...
Page of 4828
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
161 to 180 of 96556 Results
❮
❯
❯❯
0 / 200
Expand Note
Add to Folder
No Folders have been created
+
Are you sure you want to delete "My most important" ?
CESTAT dismissed the Revenue appeal and affirmed the impugned appellate order: the imported products were re-classified against the Importer (Assessee) under Chapter 27 (petroleum oils) - some consignments as Base Oil (CTH 27101960) and others as Rubber Process Oil (CTH 27075000) - holding the Assessee's classification under CTH 2803 incorrect; valuation enhancement was upheld. However, confiscation and penalty under s.112(a) were set aside as unsustainable because evidence did not establish intentional mis-declaration to evade duty and certain off-specification oils could constitute CBFS when used in manufacture. The CESTAT therefore affirmed the lower appellate conclusions on classification and value and dismissed the Revenue appeal.
CESTAT dismissed the Revenue appeal and affirmed the impugned appellate order: the imported products were re-classified against the Importer (Assessee) under Chapter 27 (petroleum oils) - some consignments as Base Oil (CTH 27101960) and others as Rubber Process Oil (CTH 27075000) - holding the Assessee's classification under CTH 2803 incorrect; valuation enhancement was upheld. However, confiscation and penalty under s.112(a) were set aside as unsustainable because evidence did not establish intentional mis-declaration to evade duty and certain off-specification oils could constitute CBFS when used in manufacture. The CESTAT therefore affirmed the lower appellate conclusions on classification and value and dismissed the Revenue appeal.
Note: It is a system-generated summary and is for quick reference only.