<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>Revenue appeal dismissed; imported oils reclassified as base oil and rubber process oil, valuation upheld, Section 112(a) penalty set aside</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/highlights?id=93841</link>
    <description>CESTAT dismissed the Revenue appeal and affirmed the impugned appellate order: the imported products were re-classified against the Importer (Assessee) under Chapter 27 (petroleum oils) - some consignments as Base Oil (CTH 27101960) and others as Rubber Process Oil (CTH 27075000) - holding the Assessee&#039;s classification under CTH 2803 incorrect; valuation enhancement was upheld. However, confiscation and penalty under s.112(a) were set aside as unsustainable because evidence did not establish intentional mis-declaration to evade duty and certain off-specification oils could constitute CBFS when used in manufacture. The CESTAT therefore affirmed the lower appellate conclusions on classification and value and dismissed the Revenue appeal.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Tue, 04 Nov 2025 08:03:32 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Tue, 04 Nov 2025 08:03:34 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=862090" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>Revenue appeal dismissed; imported oils reclassified as base oil and rubber process oil, valuation upheld, Section 112(a) penalty set aside</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/highlights?id=93841</link>
      <description>CESTAT dismissed the Revenue appeal and affirmed the impugned appellate order: the imported products were re-classified against the Importer (Assessee) under Chapter 27 (petroleum oils) - some consignments as Base Oil (CTH 27101960) and others as Rubber Process Oil (CTH 27075000) - holding the Assessee&#039;s classification under CTH 2803 incorrect; valuation enhancement was upheld. However, confiscation and penalty under s.112(a) were set aside as unsustainable because evidence did not establish intentional mis-declaration to evade duty and certain off-specification oils could constitute CBFS when used in manufacture. The CESTAT therefore affirmed the lower appellate conclusions on classification and value and dismissed the Revenue appeal.</description>
      <category>Highlights</category>
      <law>Customs</law>
      <pubDate>Tue, 04 Nov 2025 08:03:32 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/highlights?id=93841</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>