Patent-settlement expenditure treated as commercially expedient revenue outlay, with foreign-law restrictions inapplicable before the prospective amen...
Page of 4796
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
361 to 380 of 95918 Results
❮
❯
❯❯
0 / 200
Expand Note
Add to Folder
No Folders have been created
+
Are you sure you want to delete "My most important" ?
The HC upheld the Tribunal's remand to the AO for fresh adjudication on the assessee's entitlement to deductions under s.80JJA for AYs 2007-08 and 2008-09, finding no infirmity warranting rectification of the Tribunal's order and affirming the Tribunal's power under s.254 to remit for reconsideration; the Court noted that the claim under s.80JJA could not be arbitrarily disallowed where it had been allowed in earlier years on identical facts. Separately, the HC found the addition u/s 68 unsustainable on the record, observed that bank payments and confirmations substantiated the sundry creditors, and remitted the matter to the AO for de novo assessment.
The HC upheld the Tribunal's remand to the AO for fresh adjudication on the assessee's entitlement to deductions under s.80JJA for AYs 2007-08 and 2008-09, finding no infirmity warranting rectification of the Tribunal's order and affirming the Tribunal's power under s.254 to remit for reconsideration; the Court noted that the claim under s.80JJA could not be arbitrarily disallowed where it had been allowed in earlier years on identical facts. Separately, the HC found the addition u/s 68 unsustainable on the record, observed that bank payments and confirmations substantiated the sundry creditors, and remitted the matter to the AO for de novo assessment.
Note: It is a system-generated summary and is for quick reference only.
TaxTMI 
of 4796
Join Channel
TaxTMI 
