<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>Remand under s.254 upholds reassessment for s.80JJA deductions; s.68 addition struck, matter remitted to AO</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/highlights?id=93786</link>
    <description>The HC upheld the Tribunal&#039;s remand to the AO for fresh adjudication on the assessee&#039;s entitlement to deductions under s.80JJA for AYs 2007-08 and 2008-09, finding no infirmity warranting rectification of the Tribunal&#039;s order and affirming the Tribunal&#039;s power under s.254 to remit for reconsideration; the Court noted that the claim under s.80JJA could not be arbitrarily disallowed where it had been allowed in earlier years on identical facts. Separately, the HC found the addition u/s 68 unsustainable on the record, observed that bank payments and confirmations substantiated the sundry creditors, and remitted the matter to the AO for de novo assessment.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Sat, 01 Nov 2025 08:17:02 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Sat, 01 Nov 2025 08:17:03 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=861634" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>Remand under s.254 upholds reassessment for s.80JJA deductions; s.68 addition struck, matter remitted to AO</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/highlights?id=93786</link>
      <description>The HC upheld the Tribunal&#039;s remand to the AO for fresh adjudication on the assessee&#039;s entitlement to deductions under s.80JJA for AYs 2007-08 and 2008-09, finding no infirmity warranting rectification of the Tribunal&#039;s order and affirming the Tribunal&#039;s power under s.254 to remit for reconsideration; the Court noted that the claim under s.80JJA could not be arbitrarily disallowed where it had been allowed in earlier years on identical facts. Separately, the HC found the addition u/s 68 unsustainable on the record, observed that bank payments and confirmations substantiated the sundry creditors, and remitted the matter to the AO for de novo assessment.</description>
      <category>Highlights</category>
      <law>Income Tax</law>
      <pubDate>Sat, 01 Nov 2025 08:17:02 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/highlights?id=93786</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>