Inherited property sale proceeds require capital-gains treatment where ownership is supported by evidence, not suspicion or unverified signature doubt...
Cross-examination of retracted statements is essential where foundational evidence supports a benami allegation and documented funding explanations re...
Capital-goods exemption covers plant-modernisation accessories, while the import restriction applies only to earlier capital-goods components and spar...
Constitutional judicial review permits challenges to ECIRs and connected money-laundering proceedings where coercive action affects fundamental intere...
The HC upheld the Tribunal's remand to the AO for fresh adjudication on the assessee's entitlement to deductions under s.80JJA for AYs 2007-08 and 2008-09, finding no infirmity warranting rectification of the Tribunal's order and affirming the Tribunal's power under s.254 to remit for reconsideration; the Court noted that the claim under s.80JJA could not be arbitrarily disallowed where it had been allowed in earlier years on identical facts. Separately, the HC found the addition u/s 68 unsustainable on the record, observed that bank payments and confirmations substantiated the sundry creditors, and remitted the matter to the AO for de novo assessment.
The HC upheld the Tribunal's remand to the AO for fresh adjudication on the assessee's entitlement to deductions under s.80JJA for AYs 2007-08 and 2008-09, finding no infirmity warranting rectification of the Tribunal's order and affirming the Tribunal's power under s.254 to remit for reconsideration; the Court noted that the claim under s.80JJA could not be arbitrarily disallowed where it had been allowed in earlier years on identical facts. Separately, the HC found the addition u/s 68 unsustainable on the record, observed that bank payments and confirmations substantiated the sundry creditors, and remitted the matter to the AO for de novo assessment.
Note: It is a system-generated summary and is for quick reference only.