Customs relief for Strait of Hormuz maritime disruptions remains available, with existing conditions continuing unchanged through the extended validit...
NCLAT dismissed the appeal and upheld the AA's rejection of a Section 7 IBC petition seeking admission of a Rs 1 crore claim as financial debt. The Tribunal affirmed that disbursal, time-value and commercial effect can constitute financial debt even if interest is not charged and absence of a written contract is not determinative. However, the AA correctly found that default and exigibility of the debt were not established: the asserted date of default tied to completion of a project was disputed and the debt was not shown to be due and payable. No infirmity was found in the impugned order; the appeal was dismissed.
NCLAT dismissed the appeal and upheld the AA's rejection of a Section 7 IBC petition seeking admission of a Rs 1 crore claim as financial debt. The Tribunal affirmed that disbursal, time-value and commercial effect can constitute financial debt even if interest is not charged and absence of a written contract is not determinative. However, the AA correctly found that default and exigibility of the debt were not established: the asserted date of default tied to completion of a project was disputed and the debt was not shown to be due and payable. No infirmity was found in the impugned order; the appeal was dismissed.
Note: It is a system-generated summary and is for quick reference only.
TaxTMI 
of 4782
Join Channel
TaxTMI 
