https://www.taxtmi.com/highlights?id=93769 NCLAT dismissed the appeal and upheld the AA's rejection of a Section 7 IBC petition seeking admission of a Rs 1 crore claim as financial debt. The Tribunal affirmed that disbursal, time-value and commercial effect can constitute financial debt even if interest is not charged and absence of a written contract is not determinative. However, the AA correctly found that default and exigibility of the debt were not established: the asserted date of default tied to completion of a project was disputed and the debt was not shown to be due and payable. No infirmity was found in the impugned order; the appeal was dismissed. en-us Sat, 01 Nov 2025 08:17:02 +0530 Sat, 01 Nov 2025 08:17:03 +0530 TaxTMI RSS Generator https://www.taxtmi.com/highlights?id=93769 NCLAT dismissed the appeal and upheld the AA's rejection of a Section 7 IBC petition seeking admission of a Rs 1 crore claim as financial debt. The Tribunal affirmed that disbursal, time-value and commercial effect can constitute financial debt even if interest is not charged and absence of a written contract is not determinative. However, the AA correctly found that default and exigibility of the debt were not established: the asserted date of default tied to completion of a project was disputed and the debt was not shown to be due and payable. No infirmity was found in the impugned order; the appeal was dismissed. Highlights IBC Sat, 01 Nov 2025 08:17:02 +0530 https://www.taxtmi.com/highlights?id=93769