Admissibility of electronic evidence bars undervaluation demands where printouts, retracted statements and no cross-examination leave the case unprove...
Limitation in oppression and mismanagement proceedings: prior knowledge of removal and dilution barred the challenge, with valuation directions upheld...
Insolvency professional agency governance rules amended to add nominee directors, tighten independent director eligibility, and regulate managing dire...
NCLAT dismissed the appeal and upheld the AA's rejection of a Section 7 IBC petition seeking admission of a Rs 1 crore claim as financial debt. The Tribunal affirmed that disbursal, time-value and commercial effect can constitute financial debt even if interest is not charged and absence of a written contract is not determinative. However, the AA correctly found that default and exigibility of the debt were not established: the asserted date of default tied to completion of a project was disputed and the debt was not shown to be due and payable. No infirmity was found in the impugned order; the appeal was dismissed.
NCLAT dismissed the appeal and upheld the AA's rejection of a Section 7 IBC petition seeking admission of a Rs 1 crore claim as financial debt. The Tribunal affirmed that disbursal, time-value and commercial effect can constitute financial debt even if interest is not charged and absence of a written contract is not determinative. However, the AA correctly found that default and exigibility of the debt were not established: the asserted date of default tied to completion of a project was disputed and the debt was not shown to be due and payable. No infirmity was found in the impugned order; the appeal was dismissed.
Note: It is a system-generated summary and is for quick reference only.