Opportunity to respond to jurisdictional reports is mandatory before customs settlement duty enhancement; connected applications require consistent ad...
Specific customs headings for scaffolding components prevail over general classification, invalidating misclassification proceedings and enabling with...
NCLAT dismissed the appeal and upheld the AA's rejection of a Section 7 IBC petition seeking admission of a Rs 1 crore claim as financial debt. The Tribunal affirmed that disbursal, time-value and commercial effect can constitute financial debt even if interest is not charged and absence of a written contract is not determinative. However, the AA correctly found that default and exigibility of the debt were not established: the asserted date of default tied to completion of a project was disputed and the debt was not shown to be due and payable. No infirmity was found in the impugned order; the appeal was dismissed.
NCLAT dismissed the appeal and upheld the AA's rejection of a Section 7 IBC petition seeking admission of a Rs 1 crore claim as financial debt. The Tribunal affirmed that disbursal, time-value and commercial effect can constitute financial debt even if interest is not charged and absence of a written contract is not determinative. However, the AA correctly found that default and exigibility of the debt were not established: the asserted date of default tied to completion of a project was disputed and the debt was not shown to be due and payable. No infirmity was found in the impugned order; the appeal was dismissed.
Note: It is a system-generated summary and is for quick reference only.