Appeal allows marketing payments as deductible business expenses under Sec.37; director pay retained; R&D deductible from certificate date under Sec.3...
Registration under s.12AB upheld; CIT(Exemptions) exceeded jurisdiction by deciding taxability instead of preliminary verification and registration di...
Dependent Agent PE unresolved for lack of factual inquiry; arm's-length distribution accepted; royalty claim rejected; 15% refund interest (Section 24...
Page of 4826
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
9881 to 9900 of 96509 Results
❮
❯
❯❯
0 / 200
Expand Note
Add to Folder
No Folders have been created
+
Are you sure you want to delete "My most important" ?
The HC allowed the challenge, quashing the authority's refusal to condone delay under s.119(2)(b) in filing Form-10B and directing reconsideration consistent with the correct legal test: Form-10B must have been obtained, not necessarily filed, before the return to attract clause 4(i). The Court held the authority misapplied Circular No.10 by equating "filed" with "obtained" and by imposing an unduly rigid deadline of 31 March 2018. The matter was remitted with a directive that where the audit report/Form-10B was obtained prior to filing the return, the respondents shall condone delay and grant relief in accordance with CBDT guidance.
The HC allowed the challenge, quashing the authority's refusal to condone delay under s.119(2)(b) in filing Form-10B and directing reconsideration consistent with the correct legal test: Form-10B must have been obtained, not necessarily filed, before the return to attract clause 4(i). The Court held the authority misapplied Circular No.10 by equating "filed" with "obtained" and by imposing an unduly rigid deadline of 31 March 2018. The matter was remitted with a directive that where the audit report/Form-10B was obtained prior to filing the return, the respondents shall condone delay and grant relief in accordance with CBDT guidance.
Note: It is a system-generated summary and is for quick reference only.