Introducing the “In Favour Of” filter in Case Laws.
- ⚖️ Instantly identify judgments decided in favour of the Assessee, Revenue, or Appellant
- 🔍 Narrow down results with higher precision
Try it now in Case Laws →
TaxTMI Login
🚀 New Feature Launched ✕
Just a moment...
Introducing the “In Favour Of” filter in Case Laws.
Try it now in Case Laws →
Press 'Enter' to add multiple search terms. Rules for Better Search
of 
of 
No Folders have been created
Are you sure you want to delete "My most important" ?
NOTE:
of of 
All Highlights
of of All Highlights
Note
Bookmark
Share
Don't have an account? Register Here
of The HC allowed the challenge, quashing the authority's refusal to condone delay under s.119(2)(b) in filing Form-10B and directing reconsideration consistent with the correct legal test: Form-10B must have been obtained, not necessarily filed, before the return to attract clause 4(i). The Court held the authority misapplied Circular No.10 by equating 'filed' with 'obtained' and by imposing an unduly rigid deadline of 31 March 2018. The matter was remitted with a directive that where the audit report/Form-10B was obtained prior to filing the return, the respondents shall condone delay and grant relief in accordance with CBDT guidance.
TaxTMI 
TaxTMI 
