Charitable trust registration requires a specified-violation notice; settled cash deposits and related-party payments did not justify cancellation or ...
External development charges trigger TDS under section 194C, while disputed administrative payments require factual verification and fresh adjudicatio...
Section 270AA penalty immunity requires identified statutory defaults and a hearing before rejection; reassessment disclosure may constitute under-rep...
Section 80JJAA employee-cost deduction allowed for deployed staff but barred against transfer-pricing income enhancement, with pricing issues remanded...
Transfer-pricing methodology protects commercially genuine associated-enterprise payments, while pre-2016 secondary adjustments and related notional i...
Negative liens over operating assets can constitute international transactions requiring arm's-length pricing reflecting restricted borrowing and expa...
Cross-examination rights in Customs Broker revocation inquiries require witness examination; procedural denial may be cured through fresh adjudication...
The AT allowed the appeal, quashing the impugned order that froze demat accounts. It held the Exchange's circular had no application once the adjudicating authority admitted insolvency proceedings; Section 14's moratorium bars initiation or continuation of any "suit or proceeding," including recovery steps such as demat freezing, against a corporate debtor under CIRP/liquidation. The Exchange failed to file its claim before the IRP within the prescribed process and made no communication to the IRP; coercive action against parties not in management was therefore unlawful. Given these breaches of the IBC framework and absence of lawful process, the freezing order lacked legal basis and was set aside.
The AT allowed the appeal, quashing the impugned order that froze demat accounts. It held the Exchange's circular had no application once the adjudicating authority admitted insolvency proceedings; Section 14's moratorium bars initiation or continuation of any "suit or proceeding," including recovery steps such as demat freezing, against a corporate debtor under CIRP/liquidation. The Exchange failed to file its claim before the IRP within the prescribed process and made no communication to the IRP; coercive action against parties not in management was therefore unlawful. Given these breaches of the IBC framework and absence of lawful process, the freezing order lacked legal basis and was set aside.
Note: It is a system-generated summary and is for quick reference only.
TaxTMI 
TaxTMI 
of 4828 
Join Channel 
