https://www.taxtmi.com/highlights?id=93677 The AT allowed the appeal, quashing the impugned order that froze demat accounts. It held the Exchange's circular had no application once the adjudicating authority admitted insolvency proceedings; Section 14's moratorium bars initiation or continuation of any "suit or proceeding," including recovery steps such as demat freezing, against a corporate debtor under CIRP/liquidation. The Exchange failed to file its claim before the IRP within the prescribed process and made no communication to the IRP; coercive action against parties not in management was therefore unlawful. Given these breaches of the IBC framework and absence of lawful process, the freezing order lacked legal basis and was set aside. en-us Thu, 30 Oct 2025 08:22:06 +0530 Thu, 30 Oct 2025 08:22:08 +0530 TaxTMI RSS Generator https://www.taxtmi.com/highlights?id=93677 The AT allowed the appeal, quashing the impugned order that froze demat accounts. It held the Exchange's circular had no application once the adjudicating authority admitted insolvency proceedings; Section 14's moratorium bars initiation or continuation of any "suit or proceeding," including recovery steps such as demat freezing, against a corporate debtor under CIRP/liquidation. The Exchange failed to file its claim before the IRP within the prescribed process and made no communication to the IRP; coercive action against parties not in management was therefore unlawful. Given these breaches of the IBC framework and absence of lawful process, the freezing order lacked legal basis and was set aside. Highlights IBC Thu, 30 Oct 2025 08:22:06 +0530 https://www.taxtmi.com/highlights?id=93677