Charitable trust registration requires a specified-violation notice; settled cash deposits and related-party payments did not justify cancellation or ...
External development charges trigger TDS under section 194C, while disputed administrative payments require factual verification and fresh adjudicatio...
Section 270AA penalty immunity requires identified statutory defaults and a hearing before rejection; reassessment disclosure may constitute under-rep...
Section 80JJAA employee-cost deduction allowed for deployed staff but barred against transfer-pricing income enhancement, with pricing issues remanded...
Transfer-pricing methodology protects commercially genuine associated-enterprise payments, while pre-2016 secondary adjustments and related notional i...
Negative liens over operating assets can constitute international transactions requiring arm's-length pricing reflecting restricted borrowing and expa...
Cross-examination rights in Customs Broker revocation inquiries require witness examination; procedural denial may be cured through fresh adjudication...
ITAT held that the belated return filed by the assessee society on 31.03.2019 in response to a s.142(1) notice dated 01.12.2017 constituted a valid return despite delay. The AO erred in treating that return as invalid and in withdrawing the subsequently issued s.143(2) notice dated 22.09.2019, thereafter framing assessment u/s 144. The Tribunal found the AO's dispensation of the statutory obligation to serve a s.143(2) notice and framing under s.144 resulted in absence of valid assumption of jurisdiction. Section 292BB could not cure the absence of a s.143(2) notice. Consequently the s.144 assessment dated 28.12.2019 was quashed.
ITAT held that the belated return filed by the assessee society on 31.03.2019 in response to a s.142(1) notice dated 01.12.2017 constituted a valid return despite delay. The AO erred in treating that return as invalid and in withdrawing the subsequently issued s.143(2) notice dated 22.09.2019, thereafter framing assessment u/s 144. The Tribunal found the AO's dispensation of the statutory obligation to serve a s.143(2) notice and framing under s.144 resulted in absence of valid assumption of jurisdiction. Section 292BB could not cure the absence of a s.143(2) notice. Consequently the s.144 assessment dated 28.12.2019 was quashed.
Note: It is a system-generated summary and is for quick reference only.