Political contribution deductions require genuine transactions; banking records and party registration alone cannot defeat evidence of accommodation e...
Post-death GST liability permits fresh proceedings against legal representatives, while discontinued-business recovery remains limited to the inherite...
Non-confirmation of FEMA seizure prevents adjudicators from overriding pending appellate findings on recorded reasons and suspected foreign asset hold...
ITAT held that the belated return filed by the assessee society on 31.03.2019 in response to a s.142(1) notice dated 01.12.2017 constituted a valid return despite delay. The AO erred in treating that return as invalid and in withdrawing the subsequently issued s.143(2) notice dated 22.09.2019, thereafter framing assessment u/s 144. The Tribunal found the AO's dispensation of the statutory obligation to serve a s.143(2) notice and framing under s.144 resulted in absence of valid assumption of jurisdiction. Section 292BB could not cure the absence of a s.143(2) notice. Consequently the s.144 assessment dated 28.12.2019 was quashed.
ITAT held that the belated return filed by the assessee society on 31.03.2019 in response to a s.142(1) notice dated 01.12.2017 constituted a valid return despite delay. The AO erred in treating that return as invalid and in withdrawing the subsequently issued s.143(2) notice dated 22.09.2019, thereafter framing assessment u/s 144. The Tribunal found the AO's dispensation of the statutory obligation to serve a s.143(2) notice and framing under s.144 resulted in absence of valid assumption of jurisdiction. Section 292BB could not cure the absence of a s.143(2) notice. Consequently the s.144 assessment dated 28.12.2019 was quashed.
Note: It is a system-generated summary and is for quick reference only.
TaxTMI 
TaxTMI 
