Charitable trust registration requires a specified-violation notice; settled cash deposits and related-party payments did not justify cancellation or ...
External development charges trigger TDS under section 194C, while disputed administrative payments require factual verification and fresh adjudicatio...
Section 270AA penalty immunity requires identified statutory defaults and a hearing before rejection; reassessment disclosure may constitute under-rep...
Section 80JJAA employee-cost deduction allowed for deployed staff but barred against transfer-pricing income enhancement, with pricing issues remanded...
Transfer-pricing methodology protects commercially genuine associated-enterprise payments, while pre-2016 secondary adjustments and related notional i...
Negative liens over operating assets can constitute international transactions requiring arm's-length pricing reflecting restricted borrowing and expa...
Cross-examination rights in Customs Broker revocation inquiries require witness examination; procedural denial may be cured through fresh adjudication...
ITAT held that the transfer of the plot occurred in the previous year relevant to AY 2010-11 (FY 2009-10), since offer, acceptance and consideration were completed in FY 2009-10, payment was made and possession delivered, and the transaction's genuineness was subsequently recorded in a deed. The Tribunal found no contention of unfulfilled conditions and noted the assessee had declared the capital gains in AY 2010-11. Consequently, the disputed capital gains could not be taxed in the later assessment year under consideration. Grounds No. 1 and 2 raised by the assessee were allowed.
ITAT held that the transfer of the plot occurred in the previous year relevant to AY 2010-11 (FY 2009-10), since offer, acceptance and consideration were completed in FY 2009-10, payment was made and possession delivered, and the transaction's genuineness was subsequently recorded in a deed. The Tribunal found no contention of unfulfilled conditions and noted the assessee had declared the capital gains in AY 2010-11. Consequently, the disputed capital gains could not be taxed in the later assessment year under consideration. Grounds No. 1 and 2 raised by the assessee were allowed.
Note: It is a system-generated summary and is for quick reference only.