Political contribution deductions require genuine transactions; banking records and party registration alone cannot defeat evidence of accommodation e...
Post-death GST liability permits fresh proceedings against legal representatives, while discontinued-business recovery remains limited to the inherite...
Non-confirmation of FEMA seizure prevents adjudicators from overriding pending appellate findings on recorded reasons and suspected foreign asset hold...
ITAT held that the transfer of the plot occurred in the previous year relevant to AY 2010-11 (FY 2009-10), since offer, acceptance and consideration were completed in FY 2009-10, payment was made and possession delivered, and the transaction's genuineness was subsequently recorded in a deed. The Tribunal found no contention of unfulfilled conditions and noted the assessee had declared the capital gains in AY 2010-11. Consequently, the disputed capital gains could not be taxed in the later assessment year under consideration. Grounds No. 1 and 2 raised by the assessee were allowed.
ITAT held that the transfer of the plot occurred in the previous year relevant to AY 2010-11 (FY 2009-10), since offer, acceptance and consideration were completed in FY 2009-10, payment was made and possession delivered, and the transaction's genuineness was subsequently recorded in a deed. The Tribunal found no contention of unfulfilled conditions and noted the assessee had declared the capital gains in AY 2010-11. Consequently, the disputed capital gains could not be taxed in the later assessment year under consideration. Grounds No. 1 and 2 raised by the assessee were allowed.
Note: It is a system-generated summary and is for quick reference only.
TaxTMI 
TaxTMI 
