Appeal allows marketing payments as deductible business expenses under Sec.37; director pay retained; R&D deductible from certificate date under Sec.3...
Registration under s.12AB upheld; CIT(Exemptions) exceeded jurisdiction by deciding taxability instead of preliminary verification and registration di...
Dependent Agent PE unresolved for lack of factual inquiry; arm's-length distribution accepted; royalty claim rejected; 15% refund interest (Section 24...
Page of 4826
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
9881 to 9900 of 96510 Results
❮
❯
❯❯
0 / 200
Expand Note
Add to Folder
No Folders have been created
+
Are you sure you want to delete "My most important" ?
ITAT held that the transfer of the plot occurred in the previous year relevant to AY 2010-11 (FY 2009-10), since offer, acceptance and consideration were completed in FY 2009-10, payment was made and possession delivered, and the transaction's genuineness was subsequently recorded in a deed. The Tribunal found no contention of unfulfilled conditions and noted the assessee had declared the capital gains in AY 2010-11. Consequently, the disputed capital gains could not be taxed in the later assessment year under consideration. Grounds No. 1 and 2 raised by the assessee were allowed.
ITAT held that the transfer of the plot occurred in the previous year relevant to AY 2010-11 (FY 2009-10), since offer, acceptance and consideration were completed in FY 2009-10, payment was made and possession delivered, and the transaction's genuineness was subsequently recorded in a deed. The Tribunal found no contention of unfulfilled conditions and noted the assessee had declared the capital gains in AY 2010-11. Consequently, the disputed capital gains could not be taxed in the later assessment year under consideration. Grounds No. 1 and 2 raised by the assessee were allowed.
Note: It is a system-generated summary and is for quick reference only.
TaxTMI 
TaxTMI 
of 4826 
Join Channel 
