Transfer-pricing treatment of ITeS margins excludes pass-through tax recoveries and separate delayed-receivables interest after working-capital adjust...
Capacity-utilisation adjustments under TNMM can neutralise substantiated COVID-related idle costs where underutilisation materially affects profitabil...
TNMM functional comparability requires excluding rice manufacturers from a pure Basmati rice trader's benchmark and recognising operating export recei...
Working-capital adjustment subsumes delayed-receivable effects in TNMM benchmarking of captive software-development services, avoiding separate notion...
Transfer-pricing comparability requires exclusion of financially illogical super-profit comparables and correction of unsupported annual-report and ma...
Charitable character assessment preserves Section 80G approval despite inclusive spiritual teachings and incidental religious expenditure within the s...
Penalty proceedings for cash-loan acceptance require assessment proceedings and recorded Assessing Officer satisfaction; absent these, the proceedings...
Page of 4828
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
161 to 180 of 96556 Results
❮
❯
❯❯
0 / 200
Expand Note
Add to Folder
No Folders have been created
+
Are you sure you want to delete "My most important" ?
The HC quashed the impugned orders dated 08.07.2025 and 30.07.2025 issued by Respondent 1 for failure to afford an effective opportunity of hearing and for contravening applicable CBDT instructions; the matter is remitted to Respondent 1 for fresh consideration. Respondent 1 is directed to entertain and decide the petitioner's stay application dated 07.07.2025 on merits and in accordance with law within two weeks of uploading of the web copy of this order. The consequential notice dated 08.09.2025 is quashed and the attachment of the petitioner's bank account is ordered to be lifted forthwith; respondents are restrained from undertaking coercive recovery measures in respect of the assessment year.
The HC quashed the impugned orders dated 08.07.2025 and 30.07.2025 issued by Respondent 1 for failure to afford an effective opportunity of hearing and for contravening applicable CBDT instructions; the matter is remitted to Respondent 1 for fresh consideration. Respondent 1 is directed to entertain and decide the petitioner's stay application dated 07.07.2025 on merits and in accordance with law within two weeks of uploading of the web copy of this order. The consequential notice dated 08.09.2025 is quashed and the attachment of the petitioner's bank account is ordered to be lifted forthwith; respondents are restrained from undertaking coercive recovery measures in respect of the assessment year.
Note: It is a system-generated summary and is for quick reference only.